Opening a project's audit history and understanding what is recorded
In Atloria, start from the project you want to review, then open the project details area and go to the Audit History or Activity view. This is the best place to begin when you need evidence for a release, an approval trail, or a compliance request. If you already worked through release-focused checks in Using Audit History for Release Checks, use that process as your starting point and then stay in the audit view to gather the records you need for export.
The audit list is typically easiest to read when you focus on the main columns first. Look for details such as:
| Column or detail | What it tells you |
|---|---|
| Timestamp | When the event happened |
| User | Who performed the action |
| Action | What happened, such as create, edit, approve, or export |
| Record | Which document, version, approval item, or project record was affected |
| Change summary | A short description of what changed |
Use this screen to review project events such as new records being created, document edits, status updates, approval decisions, permission-related changes, and export activity when Atloria records it in the audit trail.
It also helps to know where to look when an event is not obvious. Project-level activity gives you a broad timeline across the project, which is useful when you are reconstructing what happened before a release. Record-level history is narrower and is better when you already know the exact document, version, or approval item you need to verify. Start with the project’s Audit History when you are unsure where the evidence sits, then open the related record if you need more detail.
Filtering audit events to find compliance and release evidence
Once you are in Audit History, narrow the list before you review or export anything. A long activity list is hard to defend in a compliance review, so use the filters to isolate only the events tied to the release window or audit period you care about.
- Set the Date range first so the list only shows activity from the required review period.
- Add filters for User, Action, or Record type to focus on the kind of evidence you need.
- Use the search box to find a specific document, version, approval item, or named project record.
- Change the sort order to Newest first or Oldest first depending on whether you are checking recent changes or reconstructing a full sequence.
For release and compliance work, the most useful filters are usually:
- Date range for the release window, audit period, or approval cycle
- User when you need to show who approved or changed something
- Action to isolate approvals, edits, exports, or status changes
- Record type to separate document activity from project settings or access changes
- Search to find a release candidate, controlled document, or specific item name
Sorting matters as much as filtering. Use Oldest first when you need to show the order of events, such as draft changes followed by review and then approval. Use Newest first when you are checking whether anything changed after a final approval or export.
If the list still feels too broad, remove one filter at a time and reapply it carefully. That makes it easier to see which setting is excluding the entries you expected. For broader export planning, you can also compare this workflow with Managing Audit Exports and Activity Records.
Reviewing individual audit entries and confirming the records you need
After filtering the list, open the entries that look important instead of exporting immediately. A strong compliance record depends on confirming that each entry actually proves the event you need to show.
- Click an audit entry in the list to open its full details.
- Review the Timestamp, User, Action, and related Record information.
- Check the change details to see exactly what was updated.
- Follow any available link to the related document, version, or approval item.
- Confirm that the historical event matches the current record state and your release requirements.
In the entry details, look for before-and-after values when Atloria shows them. These are especially useful for proving that a status changed from a draft or in-review state to an approved or release-ready state. They also help when you need to confirm that a document title, version status, or approval decision changed at the right time and by the right person.
Use linked records carefully. If an audit entry opens the related project item, compare the audit event with what you see on that item now. This helps you answer questions like:
- Was the final revision completed before approval?
- Did the approval happen inside the required review window?
- Was the released item the same one referenced in the audit trail?
- Were there any later changes after the event you plan to cite?
Build your final record set from entries that clearly show required approvals, final edits, release-related status changes, and any export or handoff activity tied to the review. If you need broader release decision context, pair this step with the comparison and approval guidance in Reviewing and Approving Documentation Versions.
Exporting audit history for sharing, review, or retention
When the filtered audit list shows exactly the records you need, start the export from the Audit History page. Exporting after you filter is usually better than exporting everything and sorting it later, because the file is easier to review and easier to share with internal reviewers or auditors.
- Apply the correct Date range, Action, User, and search filters on the audit list.
- Click Export on the audit history screen.
- If Atloria allows row selection, choose whether to export the full filtered list or only the selected entries.
- Choose the available export format, such as CSV or another downloadable report option shown in the export menu.
- Save the file with a clear name so you can identify the project, period, or release it covers.
Before you confirm the export, double-check the list on screen. The export should reflect the exact project scope and filtered results you intend to share. If row selection is available, use it for tightly scoped evidence packages, such as a set of approval and status-change entries for one release candidate. If row selection is not available, rely on the filters to narrow the result set.
The exported file should include the audit details visible in the list and related entry details, such as the event time, user, action, record reference, and change information when Atloria includes it in the output. Once downloaded, store the file where your team keeps release evidence or compliance records so it can be attached to review packets, retained for audit support, or shared during formal checks.
Checking exported records before distributing them
Always review the export before you send it to anyone. Even when the on-screen list looked correct, the downloaded file is the version that reviewers, auditors, or approvers will actually use.
- Open the exported file and confirm it matches the project and audit period you intended to capture.
- Check that the same event types shown in the filtered audit list appear in the file.
- Review the key columns for readability and completeness.
- Confirm that the file includes the approval, revision, or release evidence requested.
- If needed, rerun the export with narrower filters before sharing it.
Pay special attention to the core fields. At a minimum, verify that the export clearly shows:
| Field to check | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Timestamp | Proves when the event occurred |
| User | Identifies who performed the action |
| Action | Shows whether the event was an edit, approval, export, or status change |
| Record reference | Connects the event to the correct project item |
| Change details | Explains what changed and supports the compliance claim |
Then compare the file against the request you are answering. Internal reviewers may want proof of approvals and final revisions. Customers may want a release trail. Regulators or compliance teams may need a narrower set of controlled changes. If the export includes unrelated activity or sensitive details that are not needed, go back to Audit History, tighten the filters, and export again. A smaller, focused file is usually easier to approve and easier to retain.
Fixing common problems with missing, incomplete, or unexpected audit exports
If the audit list or export does not look right, troubleshoot from the Audit History screen before repeating the whole process. Most problems come from filters, scope, or access.
-
No matching audit entries appear
- Recheck that you opened the correct project.
- Expand the Date range in case the activity happened earlier or later than expected.
- Remove one filter at a time, especially Action, User, or search terms, to see which one is excluding results.
-
Expected approval or release events are missing
- Confirm that you are looking at the right type of record in the audit list.
- Open the related document, version, or approval item and check whether its own history shows the event more clearly.
- Search using the exact item name or release-related identifier shown in Atloria.
-
The exported file does not match the on-screen results
- Refresh the audit view.
- Reapply the filters and confirm the visible list before clicking Export again.
- If row selection is available, make sure the correct entries are selected.
-
You cannot export audit history
- Check whether your Atloria role includes access to audit records and the Export action.
- If you can view the audit list but not export it, ask an administrator to review your permissions in the admin workspace.
For broader permission and audit access guidance, see Reviewing Security and Audit Controls and Managing User Access and Administrative Permissions.
Overview
This guide focuses on one specific workflow in Atloria: reviewing a project’s Audit History, isolating the entries that matter for compliance or release review, and exporting those records in a form you can share or retain. The goal is not to review every project event. Instead, you use the audit list, filters, entry details, and Export action to build a clear record set that supports a release decision, an internal review, or an external request for evidence.
You will work mainly from the project’s Audit History or Activity view. From there, you can narrow the timeline with Date range, filter by User or Action, search for the exact document or version involved, open individual entries for more detail, and then export the filtered results. This is especially useful when you need to show who made a change, when an approval happened, or whether a release-related status changed during a defined review window.
This document assumes you already understand the basics of using audit history for release checks. If you need that earlier workflow, go back to Using Audit History for Release Checks. Here, the focus is on turning that review into an exportable compliance record.
You will also see how to verify the downloaded file before sharing it, so the exported record matches the on-screen audit evidence and includes the fields your reviewers actually need. The next step after this guide is Using Audit Records for Release and Approval Checks, which moves from collecting evidence to using it in approval decisions.
Prerequisites
Before you start, make sure you have access to the project and can open its Audit History or Activity view. You should also be able to recognize the project records involved in the review, such as the document, version, approval item, or release-related entry you want to trace.
You will be in the best position to use this guide if the following are already true:
- You can sign in to Atloria and open the correct project workspace
- You know which project, release window, document set, or approval cycle you are reviewing
- You can access the project’s Audit History or Activity screen
- Your role allows you to view audit records
- Your role also allows you to use Export if you need to download the results
- You know the names of the records you need to search for, such as a document title, version label, or approval item
It also helps to have the review scope defined before you begin. For example, know whether you need:
- approval evidence
- final revision history
- status changes tied to release readiness
- export activity for retention or handoff
- permission or configuration changes related to controlled content
If you are still confirming project access or account entry points, use Signing In to Atloria and Solving Access Problems or Understanding Account Entry Points and Session Navigation. If you need help finding the right project workspace first, see Working with Project Lists and Dashboards.
Was this page helpful?